N.C. Supreme Court Weighs Whether Foreclosures Need Original Documents

Previous Post
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU REPORT SEES CONFUSION ON CREDIT CARDS
Next Post
Senate’s “No” Vote on Cordray Nomination for CFPB Director Is a Blow to Students and Families

North Carolina’s Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could decide whether mortgage lenders can foreclose on a home without producing original documents that prove they are owed the money, the Associated Press reported.

The court heard from attorneys representing Wells Fargo and a Duplin County homeowner whose $50,000 loan was transferred to a series of secondary financial companies.

Lawyers for Linda Dobson of Magnolia, NC argued that Wells Fargo and its affiliates cannot foreclose on her home without producing the original promissory note proving they are due the debt, something they have not done after more than three years.

Wells Fargo attorney John Mandulak said it has not produced the original loan documents yet, but might be able to do that if the court agrees to revive its case and send it back to a lower court for trial.

Recent Posts
NEW HICKORY OFFICE LOCATION
WE HAVE MOVED OUR HICKORY OFFICE!!
NO MORE LOAN SHARKS ?
Opinion: Why bankruptcy must be an option for homeowners and small businesses to survive this COVID-19 recession
The Most Significant Change to the Bankruptcy Code in 40 Years
NW NORTH CAROLINA: SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK
NACBA Joins with 65 Organizations Calling for Cancelling Student Debt to Tackle Economic Fallout
Opinion: Why bankruptcy must be an option for homeowners and small businesses to survive this COVID-19 recession
Broadband Survey for Faster Internet
DEFUSE THE STUDENT DEBT BOMB